Quality of Life
Yesterday, I got into quite a ramble about this week's BLOGExplosion billboard renter, Crystal Clear. [See Crystal Clear and Dark Glass] Crystal writes on socially relevant and current topics like right to life (specifically Terri Schiavo) and illegal immigration, in general she seems to have a strong conservative stance. I didn't get much further than setting up Crystal's position and highlighting some of Liguori Publications' related products before I realized that I needed to break this into several posts. Today, I would like to touch on some of the right to life / pro-life issues. My post won't be anywhere near exhaustive (at least no more exhausting than my readers usually find my writing) but I'm hoping it form a point for discussion. SO PLEASE LEAVE COMMENTS, I really want to hear what my readers have to say. Also, please remember that I am not Catholic and my opinions / beliefs are my own. They may or may not coincide with the views of Liguori on any given topic and at any given time. Liguori is a Catholic publishing house and remains true to the teachings of the Catholic Church and the Redemptorist Charism.
In regard to Terri Schiavo, I feel for her, I feel for her family, but I think it is a blessing that she has passed on. When I think of Terri, I can't help but think of the millions throughout the world who will perish from easily remedied medical conditions.
What if Terri had been a single African American mother of 4? What if she had lived in East St. Louis and worked 3 mininum wage jobs that didn't provide benefits? What if she had died from an infection that the free clinic missed? Would we even know her name? Would her children find nurturing environments in the foster care system?
How many people, how many families, how many communities; would have benefited from the medical, political and financial resources which were brought to bear on the case of Terri Schiavo? In the most optimistic of outcomes, what would Terri's quality of life have been? Is it a tradeoff she would have been willing to make?
My training and background is in Economics, which I have always thought of as more philosophy than science. It can be thought of as the study of the allocation of limited resources when there are infinite wants. When one life can be preserved poorly with the resources that could preserve 100 well it becomes a classic Economic issue. While the world was focused on the ethics of one poor soul and a feeding tube, did anyone see the counter balancing outcome that may have just as surely killed several nameless others?
Peace,
P. Del Ricci - Dark Glass